WND Article RatingSupreme Court bashes state's anti-Christian agenda - AGAIN!
- Bias Rating
70% Very Conservative
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
82% Extremely Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
42% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
| "But the narrow decision was based on that hostility, and didn't resolve the issue that is the sole question in the new case: Whether applying a public accommodation law to compel an artist to speak or stay silent violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment." | Positive | 2% Conservative |
| "The First Amendment envisions the United States as a rich and complex place where all persons are free to think and speak as they wish, not as the government demands." | Negative | -4% Liberal |
| "In 2018, the court was thought to be ready to clarify the applicable standards in the case of a religious cake shop owner who refused to make cakes for same-sex couples." | Negative | -4% Liberal |
| "But she could not create content that contradicts biblical truth.The framers designed the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to protect the 'freedom to think as you will and to speak as you think,' the ruling said." | Negative | -6% Liberal |
| "Consistent with the First Amendment, the nation's answer is tolerance, not coercion." | Negative | -8% Liberal |
| "It ruled that the state, under the guise of a non-discrimination law, caot force a graphic designer to violate her Christian faith and promote same-sex marriages." | Negative | -10% Liberal |
| "Colorado caot deny that promise consistent with the First Amendment, the court said." | Negative | -10% Liberal |
| "All of this on top of the radical left's renewed obsession with killing women's unborn babies via abortion." | Negative | -10% Liberal |
| "Turley noted while he, himself, supports same-sex marriages, he doubted the legality of the state's Anti-Discrimination Act that has as its very purpose to be eliminating ... ideas." | Negative | -12% Liberal |
| "The court ultimately punted in that case, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, ruling for the owner yet leaving uncertainty over the constitutional limitations on cities and states under anti-discrimination law." | Negative | -16% Liberal |
| "In that case, the state had tried to impose a reindoctrination program on Phillips, to address his beliefs about same-sex marriage." | Negative | -18% Liberal |
| "He said, Many years ago, I wrote an academic piece on how anti-discrimination laws would inevitably collide with free-speech and free-exercise rights." | Negative | -18% Liberal |
| "Trump team furious at McCarthy for questioning if he's strongest presidential candidateNot happening, the high court ruled." | Negative | -26% Liberal |
| "Earlier, WND reported that George Washington University professor and legal commentator Jonathan Turley had predicted the state would fare ill in the fight brought on by the all-Democrat state legislature and leftist homosexual governor, the multi-millionaire Jared Polis, in Colorado." | Negative | -26% Liberal |
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
51% : But the narrow decision was based on that hostility, and didn't resolve the issue that is the sole question in the new case: "Whether applying a public accommodation law to compel an artist to speak or stay silent violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment."48% : The First Amendment envisions the United States as a rich and complex place where all persons are free to think and speak as they wish, not as the government demands.
48% : In 2018, the court was thought to be ready to clarify the applicable standards in the case of a religious cake shop owner who refused to make cakes for same-sex couples.
47% : But she could not create content that contradicts "biblical truth.""The framers designed the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to protect the 'freedom to think as you will and to speak as you think,'" the ruling said.
46% :"Consistent with the First Amendment, the nation's answer is tolerance, not coercion.
45% : It ruled that the state, under the guise of a "non-discrimination" law, cannot force a graphic designer to violate her Christian faith and promote same-sex marriages.
45% :"Colorado cannot deny that promise consistent with the First Amendment," the court said.
45% : All of this on top of the radical left's renewed obsession with killing women's unborn babies via abortion.
44% : Turley noted while he, himself, supports same-sex marriages, he doubted the legality of the state's "Anti-Discrimination Act" that has as its very purpose to be "eliminating ... ideas."
42% : The court ultimately punted in that case, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, ruling for the owner yet leaving uncertainty over the constitutional limitations on cities and states under anti-discrimination law."
41% : In that case, the state had tried to impose a reindoctrination program on Phillips, to address his beliefs about same-sex marriage.
41% : He said, "Many years ago, I wrote an academic piece on how anti-discrimination laws would inevitably collide with free-speech and free-exercise rights.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.