Supreme Court poised to support law banning domestic abusers from owning guns

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

51% : Underscoring the significance of the case, hundreds of gun safety and domestic violence prevention advocates rallied outside the Supreme Court ahead of the arguments, holding signs that read "Moms demand action" or "students demand action" on gun control.
45% : The court, in recent years, has tended to side with gun rights advocates, including in major decisions in 2008, 2010 and the Bruen decision last year.
41% : "Wright said the Biden administration was misreading recent Supreme Court precedents expanding gun rights, especially last year's decision in Bruen.
38% : While the law made no reference to guns and domestic violence at the time of the nation's founding, gun control groups say there is plenty of history around the idea of states banning dangerous people possessing guns.
37% : U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, representing the Biden administration and defending the federal law, also faced some sharp questioning from the court's conservatives about the scope of her argument that people who are "not responsible" or "dangerous" can be barred from gun ownership.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.