Supreme Court rules in favor of Christian postal employee who wanted Sundays off

  • Bias Rating

    8% Center

  • Reliability

    50% ReliableFair

  • Policy Leaning

    8% Center

  • Politician Portrayal

    N/A

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

N/A

  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
"In response to the ruling, Karen Loewy, Senior Counsel and Director of Constitutional Law Practice at Lambda Legal, wrote, It is gratifying that the Supreme Court today recognized that employers may consider the effect a requested accommodation has on others in the workplace in assessing whether the accommodation would substantially burden the conduct of its business.While anti-discrimination laws absolutely require accommodation of religion, some requested accommodations unfairly burden co-workers, impact workplace morale, and expose coworkers to dignitary harms in ways that impose costs and harm the business itself, Loewy continued."
Positive
0% Conservative
"While the decision leaves the issue open to further court scrutiny, it also leaves open the possibility of anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination in businesses and workplaces."
Negative
-2% Liberal
"One could easily imagine employees refusing to serve LGBTQ+ patrons, much like the web designer in the case of 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, another current Court case about whether Christians can be exempt from anti-discrimination laws."
Negative
-6% Liberal

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

50% : In response to the ruling, Karen Loewy, Senior Counsel and Director of Constitutional Law Practice at Lambda Legal, wrote, "It is gratifying that the Supreme Court today recognized that employers may consider the effect a requested accommodation has on others in the workplace in assessing whether the accommodation would substantially burden the conduct of its business.""While anti-discrimination laws absolutely require accommodation of religion, some requested accommodations unfairly burden co-workers, impact workplace morale, and expose coworkers to dignitary harms in ways that impose costs and harm the business itself," Loewy continued.
49% : While the decision leaves the issue open to further court scrutiny, it also leaves open the possibility of anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination in businesses and workplaces.
47% : "One could easily imagine employees refusing to serve LGBTQ+ patrons, much like the web designer in the case of 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, another current Court case about whether Christians can be exempt from anti-discrimination laws.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link