NPR Article RatingSupreme Court to decide if gun bans for domestic abusers are constitutional
- Bias Rating
-96% Extremely Liberal
- Reliability
55% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
-96% Extremely Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
42% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
| "If the federal law falls, so would similar laws in most states, and other important gun laws." | Negative | -4% Liberal |
| "The defendant in the case, Zackey Rahimi, is something of a poster child for why Congress passed the law in 1994." | Negative | -6% Liberal |
| "More generally, Dreeben says, a decision against the federal law could cast doubt on an a network of prohibitions enacted by state and local governments that have been shown to be even more effective because of their greater breadth." | Negative | -12% Liberal |
| "In 2019, Barrett dissented when the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the law baing convicted felons from possessing guns." | Negative | -22% Liberal |
| "At issue is the federal law that makes it a crime for anyone subject to a domestic violence court order to possess a gun." | Negative | -24% Liberal |
| "The Supreme Court hears arguments Tuesday in a case that could invalidate the federal law barring guns for anyone who is the subject of a domestic violence court order." | Negative | -26% Liberal |
| "Have they now been dispossessed of their Second Amendment rights for the lives?Dreeben sees the dangers as far more imminent if the court strikes down the law baing guns for those covered by domestic violence protective orders." | Negative | -26% Liberal |
| "He says that a decision invalidating the federal law will rip a hole in the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, which requires protective orders of the type that Rahimi had, to be entered into the system so they can serve as flags to deny the purchase of firearms." | Negative | -28% Liberal |
| "But he continued to press his constitutional challenge, and ultimately the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the law is unconstitutional because there was nothing like it in the 1790s." | Negative | -32% Liberal |
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
48% : If the federal law falls, so would similar laws in most states, and other important gun laws.47% : The defendant in the case, Zackey Rahimi, is something of a poster child for why Congress passed the law in 1994.
44% : More generally, Dreeben says, a decision against the federal law could cast doubt on an a network of prohibitions enacted by state and local governments that have been shown to be even more effective because of their greater breadth.
39% : In 2019, Barrett dissented when the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the law banning convicted felons from possessing guns.
38% : At issue is the federal law that makes it a crime for anyone subject to a domestic violence court order to possess a gun.
37% : The Supreme Court hears arguments Tuesday in a case that could invalidate the federal law barring guns for anyone who is the subject of a domestic violence court order.
37% : "Have they now been dispossessed of their Second Amendment rights for the lives?"Dreeben sees the dangers as far more imminent if the court strikes down the law banning guns for those covered by domestic violence protective orders.
36% : He says that a decision invalidating the federal law "will rip a hole" in the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, which requires protective orders of the type that Rahimi had, to be entered into the system so they can serve as flags to deny the purchase of firearms.
34% : But he continued to press his constitutional challenge, and ultimately the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the law is unconstitutional because there was nothing like it in the 1790s.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.