Texas Case Could End Access to 'Dangerous' Abortion-Inducing Drug Nationwide - The Minnesota Sun
- Bias Rating
Center
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
2% Center
- Politician Portrayal
26% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
"Mifepristone is the first pill taken to induce abortion, followed by misoprostol." | Negative | -10% Liberal |
"The plaintiffs claim the FDA is required to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all Americans by rejecting or limiting the use of dangerous drugs but failed America's women and girls when it chose politics over science and approved chemical abortion drugs for use in the United States." | Negative | -12% Liberal |
"The FDA and the Administration as a whole have no intention to respect the Constitution, the Supreme Court, or the democratic process when it comes to abortion, Fitch asserted." | Negative | -20% Liberal |
Upgrade your account to obtain complete site access and more analytics below. |
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
45% : Mifepristone is the first pill taken to induce abortion, followed by misoprostol.44% : The plaintiffs claim the FDA is required to "protect the health, safety, and welfare of all Americans by rejecting or limiting the use of dangerous drugs" but "failed America's women and girls when it chose politics over science and approved chemical abortion drugs for use in the United States."
40% : "The FDA and the Administration as a whole have no intention to respect the Constitution, the Supreme Court, or the democratic process when it comes to abortion," Fitch asserted.
31% : Second, the FDA's actions defy federal criminal law.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.