The reversal of Roe v. Wade breaks the US standard for healthcare

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

49% : "I have great concern for women who develop the need for abortion later in pregnancy," Chen says.
44% : In its statement, the American Medical Association described the decision as an "egregious allowance of government intrusion into medicine.""We will always have physicians' backs and defend the practice of medicine, we will fight to protect the patient-physician relationship, and we will oppose any law or regulation that compromises or criminalizes patient access to safe, evidence-based medical care, including abortion," the organization wrote.
40% : "We are going to see an abundance of lawsuits for the next 10 years, if not longer, around what states can and cannot do to regulate abortion," she says.
39% : About half of US states are expected to ban abortion.
38% :Physicians in states facing harsh new restrictions on abortion are already confronting difficult questions about how best to provide care to their patients.
37% : There aren't easy answers, and there's a lot of uncertainty.""In states with existing trigger laws [that ban abortion], there's uncertainty about whether they're in effect or not," Bridges explains further.
30% : Blocking access to abortion will only serve to increase health complications and deaths among pregnant people, Gariepy explains, compounding the nation's already-terrible record with maternal fatalities.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.