Fast Company Magazine Article RatingThe Supreme Court just seriously limited the government's ability to fight climate change
- Bias Rating
-12% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
22% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
24% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
| "The lawsuit argued -- and the court agreed, in a 6-3 opinion authored by Chief Justice Roberts -- that the EPA could only regulate emissions from individual power plants at each location, rather than pushing the industry to adopt solutions like renewable energy." | Positive | 8% Conservative |
| "And at a time when the head of the United Nations has warned that the world is sleepwalking to climate catastrophe, the Supreme Court just limited the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to regulate emissions from power plants." | Negative | -14% Liberal |
| "But it's also a more general attack on the federal government's ability to enact regulation." | Negative | -14% Liberal |
Upgrade your account to obtain complete site access and more analytics below. | ||
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
54% : The lawsuit argued -- and the court agreed, in a 6-3 opinion authored by Chief Justice Roberts -- that the EPA could only regulate emissions from individual power plants at each location, rather than pushing the industry to adopt solutions like renewable energy.43% : And at a time when the head of the United Nations has warned that the world is "sleepwalking to climate catastrophe," the Supreme Court just limited the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to regulate emissions from power plants.
43% : But it's also a more general attack on the federal government's ability to enact regulation.
36% : The case, West Virginia vs. EPA, brought by Republican attorneys general from 19 states (joined by coal companies), came after years of conservative strategizing.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.