The Supreme Court's EPA ruling may spell doom for US climate goals
- Bias Rating
-12% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
46% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
78% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
"Today, the court voted 6-3 to limit the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s ability to regulate carbon emissions from power plants." | Positive | 10% Conservative |
"In 2020, the US electric power industry emitted 1.71 billion short tons of carbon dioxide: 99 percent of that came from coal, natural gas, and petroleum fuels, despite them only making up 62 percent of the US electricity supply." | Positive | 10% Conservative |
"However, this decision could have a major domino effect on federal environmental regulations, and keep the EPA from doing its main job -- protecting people and the environment from harm." | Negative | -2% Liberal |
Upgrade your account to obtain complete site access and more analytics below. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
55% : Today, the court voted 6-3 to limit the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s ability to regulate carbon emissions from power plants.55% : In 2020, the US electric power industry emitted 1.71 billion short tons of carbon dioxide: 99 percent of that came from coal, natural gas, and petroleum fuels, despite them only making up 62 percent of the US electricity supply.
49% : However, this decision could have a major domino effect on federal environmental regulations, and keep the EPA from doing its main job -- protecting people and the environment from harm.
40% : The case brought before SCOTUS, West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, essentially questioned the EPA's authority to pass major regulations across the power sector.
36% : "The ruling ignores the interconnected structure of the power sector and imposes unnecessary limits on the pollution reduction options EPA can consider, which will result in higher costs and worse air pollution across the United States."
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.