Above the Law Article RatingTrump Says He Magically Transformed Classified War Plans Into Personal Records, Demands Dismissal Of Docs Case
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
3% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
| "His minion Kash Patel even claimed to have been present when Trump laid hands on the documents and rendered them personal property." | Positive | 34% Conservative |
| "Both pleadings work from the premise that Trump somehow transformed dozens of top secret and classified documents into personal records before stuffing them in his luggage and stomping off to Florida." | Negative | -8% Liberal |
| "By this logic, Trump was entitled to pocket the entire national security archive and sell it to Putin, a maximalist claim which is functionally equivalent to the SEAL Team 6 argument Trump's lawyers made to the DC Circuit." | Negative | -10% Liberal |
Upgrade your account to obtain complete site access and more analytics below. | ||
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
67% : His minion Kash Patel even claimed to have been present when Trump laid hands on the documents and rendered them personal property.46% : "Both pleadings work from the premise that Trump somehow transformed dozens of top secret and classified documents into personal records before stuffing them in his luggage and stomping off to Florida.
45% : By this logic, Trump was entitled to pocket the entire national security archive and sell it to Putin, a maximalist claim which is functionally equivalent to the "SEAL Team 6" argument Trump's lawyers made to the DC Circuit.
42% : "President Trump is pursuing further review of that erroneous decision, including en banc review if allowed, and review in the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary," they sniff.
34% : Tom Fitton, the spandex-shirted head of Judicial Watch, convinced Trump that Socks means no court can ever question a president's designation of a record as personal.
27% : 2d 288 (D.D.C. 2012), AKA "The Socks Case," AKA "The Clinton Socks Case," AKA "The Sock Drawer Case," AKA "That Ruling That Trump's Been Yelling About For Two Years Because Tom Fitton Said
27% : In Socks, Judge Amy Berman Jackson said the PRA didn't give her the authority to order the National Archives (NARA) to seize tapes made by Bill Clinton for his biographer Taylor Branch.
26% : These arguments reductio themselves ad absurdum, but that hasn't stopped Trump from making them.
23% : Last night, Donald Trump dropped four motions to dismiss the Florida documents case on the public docket, plus at least three more under seal.
22% : And while we're on the subject, Trump is charged with violating the Espionage Act and obstructing justice -- not violating the PRA.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.