Trump's Former Chief of Staff Mark Meadows Loses Bid to Move Racketeering Case to Federal Court
- Bias Rating
-10% Center
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
8% Center
- Politician Portrayal
74% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
"Particularly, Jones said that, The Court finds that the color of the Office of the White House Chief of Staff did not include working with or working for the Trump campaign, except for simply coordinating the President's schedule, traveling with the President to his campaign events, and redirecting communications to the campaign.Thus, consistent with his testimony and the federal statutes and regulations, engaging in political activities exceeds the outer limits of the Office of the White House Chief of Staff, Jones wrote in his 49-page ruling." | Negative | -10% Liberal |
"Graham testified before the special grand jury about his phone calls to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger, who said in his own testimony that the conversation with Graham made him uncomfortable because some of his suggestions might have led to disenfranchising voters." | Negative | -14% Liberal |
"Because the trial would still be under state law, however, Meadows would not have been eligible for a federal pardon." | Negative | -24% Liberal |
Upgrade your account to obtain complete site access and more analytics below. |
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
45% : Particularly, Jones said that, "The Court finds that the color of the Office of the White House Chief of Staff did not include working with or working for the Trump campaign, except for simply coordinating the President's schedule, traveling with the President to his campaign events, and redirecting communications to the campaign.""Thus, consistent with his testimony and the federal statutes and regulations, engaging in political activities exceeds the outer limits of the Office of the White House Chief of Staff," Jones wrote in his 49-page ruling.43% : Graham testified before the special grand jury about his phone calls to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger, who said in his own testimony that the conversation with Graham made him "uncomfortable" because some of his suggestions might have led to "disenfranchising voters.
38% : Because the trial would still be under state law, however, Meadows would not have been eligible for a federal pardon.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.