mLive Article RatingUM says 'natural experiment' in race-blind admissions hasn't worked
- Bias Rating
50% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
| "The plaintiff in the cases before the Supreme Court, an organization called Students for Fair Admissions, argued in a brief filed over the summer that baing affirmative action nationwide would help diversity at schools like the University of Michigan because they could better compete with universities who currently use race." | Positive | 8% Conservative |
| "The ban on affirmative action not only reduced the number of Black and Latino students in University of California schools, which are more selective than those in the California State University system, but also reduced their odds of ever graduating from college and their earnings, as well." | Negative | -6% Liberal |
| "Other states that have baed affirmative action, such as Oklahoma, have argued in an amicus brief that such bans haven't hurt diversity at their public universities." | Negative | -24% Liberal |
| "He pointed to research by a professor at California State University, Chico that shows the number of minority students earning degrees from California's public universities actually rose after the state baed affirmative action in 1996." | Negative | -34% Liberal |
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
54% : The plaintiff in the cases before the Supreme Court, an organization called Students for Fair Admissions, argued in a brief filed over the summer that banning affirmative action nationwide would help diversity at schools like the University of Michigan "because they could better compete with universities who currently use race."47% : The ban on affirmative action not only reduced the number of Black and Latino students in University of California schools, which are more selective than those in the California State University system, but also reduced their odds of ever graduating from college and their earnings, as well.
38% :Other states that have banned affirmative action, such as Oklahoma, have argued in an amicus brief that such bans haven't hurt diversity at their public universities.
33% : He pointed to research by a professor at California State University, Chico that shows the number of minority students earning degrees from California's public universities actually rose after the state banned affirmative action in 1996.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.