JURIST Article RatingUS Supreme Court finds in favor of web designer who refused to create websites for LGBTQ+ couples
- Bias Rating
56% Very Conservative
- Reliability
90% ReliableExcellent
- Policy Leaning
56% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
54% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
| "The First Amendment envisions the United States as a rich and complex place where all persons are free to think and speak as they wish, not as the government demands." | Negative | -4% Liberal |
| "Gorsuch also cited the case Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, where the Court found in favor of a Boy Scout policy baing LGBTQ+ people from participating in scouting, despite a New Jersey public accommodations anti-discrimination law." | Negative | -8% Liberal |
| "Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the majority, emphasized that while anti-discrimination laws are constitutional, it is not constitutional to compel someone to make art, as art is akin to speech." | Negative | -28% Liberal |
| "The opinion rests on the precedential case of Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc, in which an LGBTQ+ group was baed from a St. Patrick's Day Parade and sued under a Massachusetts public accommodation anti-discrimination law." | Negative | -34% Liberal |
| "In June 29 remarks from the White House, President Joe Biden said, Today, the court once again walked away from decades of precedent.The court has effectively ended affirmative action in college admissions, and" | Positive | 6% Conservative |
| "In a tweet praising a concurring majority opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas, Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., said the high court's decision is the right one.Students should be judged on their merits, not the color of their skin, Rubio, who is Catholic, wrote." | Negative | -4% Liberal |
| "In a tweet praising a concurring majority opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas, Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., said the high court's decision is the right one.Students should be judged on their merits, not the color of their skin, Rubio, who is Catholic, wrote." | Negative | -4% Liberal |
| "Biden, the nation's second Catholic president, claimed many Americans wrongly believe affirmative action allowed unqualified students to be admitted over qualified students." | Negative | -8% Liberal |
| "I strongly -- strongly -- disagree with the court's decision, Biden said." | Negative | -10% Liberal |
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
48% : The First Amendment envisions the United States as a rich and complex place where all persons are free to think and speak as they wish, not as the government demands.46% :Gorsuch also cited the case Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, where the Court found in favor of a Boy Scout policy banning LGBTQ+ people from participating in scouting, despite a New Jersey public accommodations anti-discrimination law.
36% : Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the majority, emphasized that while anti-discrimination laws are constitutional, it is not constitutional to compel someone to make art, as art is akin to speech.
33% : The opinion rests on the precedential case of Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc, in which an LGBTQ+ group was banned from a St. Patrick's Day Parade and sued under a Massachusetts public accommodation anti-discrimination law.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.