KTTS Article RatingU.S. Supreme Court limits federal power to curb carbon emissions at power plants
- Bias Rating
40% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
20% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
92% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
| "It deprives EPA of the power needed -- and the power granted -- to curb the emission of greenhouse gases.Led by West Virginia, the case was brought by a coalition of Republican-led states and coal companies that contested an earlier federal appeals court decision that said the EPA had the power to issue the kind of regulations they opposed." | Positive | 0% Conservative |
| "In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court said on Thursday that the Environmental Protection Agency has no authority in regulating carbon emissions from existing power plants." | Negative | -18% Liberal |
| "The Obama administration had plaed to require states to lower carbon dioxide emissions by replacing coal power plants with green energy sources." | Negative | -30% Liberal |
| "But when President Biden took office, he reversed course and promised to slash greenhouse emissions nationwide dramatically." | Negative | -14% Liberal |
| "Biden has ordered the Justice Department and other affected agencies to review the Supreme Court ruling and devise plans to allow federal law to cut back on emissions that cause climate change." | Negative | -14% Liberal |
| "The Obama administration had plaed to require states to lower carbon dioxide emissions by replacing coal power plants with green energy sources." | Negative | -28% Liberal |
| "During Donald Trump's presidency, he replaced Obama's initiative with a plan that essentially removed all regulations." | Positive | 6% Conservative |
| "During Donald Trump's presidency, he replaced Obama's initiative with a plan that essentially removed all regulations." | Positive | 6% Conservative |
| "Biden called the ruling another devastating decision that aims to take our country backwards." | Negative | -42% Liberal |
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
50% : It deprives EPA of the power needed -- and the power granted -- to curb the emission of greenhouse gases."Led by West Virginia, the case was brought by a coalition of Republican-led states and coal companies that contested an earlier federal appeals court decision that said the EPA had the power to issue the kind of regulations they opposed.41% : In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court said on Thursday that the Environmental Protection Agency has no authority in regulating carbon emissions from existing power plants.
35% : The Obama administration had planned to require states to lower carbon dioxide emissions by replacing coal power plants with green energy sources.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.