U.S. Supreme Court to hear affirmative action cases that echo previous attempts to target UT
- Bias Rating
-2% Center
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
-22% Somewhat Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
34% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
"The case against Harvard and UNC will be the court's first major case to consider affirmative action since 2016." | Positive | 24% Conservative |
"Blum also is asking the court to overturn its 2003 ruling in Grutter v. Bollinger, which first upheld the use of affirmative action at the law school admissions program at the University of Michigan." | Positive | 12% Conservative |
"The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear two cases that challenge the use of race in college admissions, which could determine the future of affirmative action in higher education." | Positive | 8% Conservative |
Upgrade your account to obtain complete site access and more analytics below. |
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
62% : The case against Harvard and UNC will be the court's first major case to consider affirmative action since 2016.56% : Blum also is asking the court to overturn its 2003 ruling in Grutter v. Bollinger, which first upheld the use of affirmative action at the law school admissions program at the University of Michigan.
54% : The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear two cases that challenge the use of race in college admissions, which could determine the future of affirmative action in higher education.
51% : Supreme Court justices questioned the University of Texas' use of race in admissions in a case that could lead to new limits on affirmative action.
50% : The Supreme Court has previously upheld affirmative action in multiple cases, including most recently in Fisher v. University of Texas in 2016, when Blum lost his challenge to the school's consideration of race in its undergraduate admissions process.
24% : Since the 2016 ruling, Blum has continued to pursue challenges against affirmative action, and the court also has grown more conservative with three new judges appointed by former President Donald Trump.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.