The Christian Science Monitor Article RatingWary Supreme Court voices skepticism about abortion pill case
- Bias Rating
14% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
85% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
14% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
60% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
18% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
| "The case stems from two lawsuits filed by a coalition of anti-abortion physicians and organizations - against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the drug's manufacturer, respectively." | Positive | 26% Conservative |
| "If the justices side with the anti-abortion physicians, the Biden administration and medical experts have said, it could have a chilling effect on drug research and development in the U.S. far beyond the issue of abortion." | Positive | 2% Conservative |
| "Abortion is not at stake here, she adds." | Negative | -12% Liberal |
| "In its lawsuits, the anti-abortion coalition claims that the FDA was too hasty with its approvals, overlooking serious medical problems that can arise from the looser regulations." | Negative | -26% Liberal |
| "Both Justice Alito and Justice Clarence Thomas observed during the argument that the FDA rule allowing mifepristone to be delivered by mail could violate the Comstock Act, an 1873 law that baed the mailing of abortion drugs or devices." | Negative | -36% Liberal |
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
63% : The case stems from two lawsuits filed by a coalition of anti-abortion physicians and organizations - against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the drug's manufacturer, respectively.51% : If the justices side with the anti-abortion physicians, the Biden administration and medical experts have said, it could have a chilling effect on drug research and development in the U.S. far beyond the issue of abortion.
44% : "Abortion is not at stake here," she adds.
37% : In its lawsuits, the anti-abortion coalition claims that the FDA was too hasty with its approvals, overlooking serious medical problems that can arise from the looser regulations.
32% : Both Justice Alito and Justice Clarence Thomas observed during the argument that the FDA rule allowing mifepristone to be delivered by mail could violate the Comstock Act, an 1873 law that banned the mailing of abortion drugs or devices.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.