- Bias Rating
-70% Very Liberal
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
60% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
"Surveys demonstrate that the majority of Asians favor affirmative action but supporting affirmative action doesn't mean supporting prejudices like the racist trope that Asians are dull and boring, which seems to be supported by Harvard's system of giving Asians lower personality scores." | Positive | 2% Conservative |
"The group that brought the cases, Students for Fair Admissions, also raised the point but spent the majority of the time answering questions about whether it was time to dispense with affirmative action particularly in light of Justice Sandra Day O'Coor's writing in 2003 that the need for such race-conscious policies would likely be gone within twenty-five years." | Negative | -2% Liberal |
"In Monday's five-hour long Supreme Court arguments about the future of affirmative action it was easy to forget that the cases first arose from alleged discrimination against Asian American applicants in the admission processes." | Negative | -4% Liberal |
"There is little doubt that Blum saw an opportunity with Asian Americans to give the newly conservative SCOTUS the opportunity to strike down affirmative action and given the questions Monday there is little doubt that the votes exist to do just that." | Negative | -4% Liberal |
"During the Supreme Court arguments about the future of affirmative action, one might be forgiven for forgetting the cases arose from alleged discrimination against Asian Americans." | Negative | -10% Liberal |
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
51% : Surveys demonstrate that the majority of Asians favor affirmative action but supporting affirmative action doesn't mean supporting prejudices like the racist trope that Asians are dull and boring, which seems to be supported by Harvard's system of giving Asians lower personality scores.49% : The group that brought the cases, Students for Fair Admissions, also raised the point but spent the majority of the time answering questions about whether it was time to dispense with affirmative action particularly in light of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's writing in 2003 that the need for such race-conscious policies would likely be gone within twenty-five years.
48% : In Monday's five-hour long Supreme Court arguments about the future of affirmative action it was easy to forget that the cases first arose from alleged discrimination against Asian American applicants in the admission processes.
48% : There is little doubt that Blum saw an opportunity with Asian Americans to give the newly conservative SCOTUS the opportunity to strike down affirmative action and given the questions Monday there is little doubt that the votes exist to do just that.
45% : During the Supreme Court arguments about the future of affirmative action, one might be forgiven for forgetting the cases arose from alleged discrimination against Asian Americans.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.