What a Roe v. Wade Overturn Could Mean For Birth Control
- Bias Rating
-12% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
82% Extremely Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
54% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
"The draft takes aim at the right to privacy, which is the basis for several other rights that the Court has established over the years, including same-sex and interracial marriage as well as the right to contraception." | Positive | 6% Conservative |
"He goes on to demonstrate how a similar scenario could play out for same-sex marriage." | Positive | 2% Conservative |
"The problem is that this draft opinion, if made official, could potentially set a precedent for future challenges to contraceptive access -- as well as marriage equality." | Negative | -4% Liberal |
Upgrade your account to obtain complete site access and more analytics below. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
53% : The draft takes aim at the right to privacy, which is the basis for several other rights that the Court has established over the years, including same-sex and interracial marriage as well as the right to contraception.51% : He goes on to demonstrate how a similar scenario could play out for same-sex marriage.
48% : The problem is that this draft opinion, if made official, could potentially set a precedent for future challenges to contraceptive access -- as well as marriage equality.
46% : The opinion, if made official, would overturn Roe v. Wade and the right to abortion under the US Constitution.
45% : It has since been used in cases like Roe v. Wade and Obergefell v. Hodges, the 2015 case that established the right to same-sex marriage.
37% : Later, he asked, "Does this mean that in Florida they can decide they're going to pass a law saying that same-sex marriage is not permissible, that it's against the law in Florida?"These are scary scenarios to think about, to say the least.
11% : In the draft, Alito wrote, "Nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion," setting up abortion as a unique issue because it involves a "critical moral question."
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.