What's at stake in Tuesday's Supreme Court abortion pill case

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

63% : Anti-abortion arguments about the risks of abortion pills are based largely on studies that have recently been retracted by the journal that published them.
59% : And while anti-abortion advocates have scrambled to imagine new laws that might crack down on the flow of pills through the mail system, any legislation of that kind would be very difficult to get through Congress and hard to enforce at the state level.
58% : The largest of these clinics, Aid Access, now mails approximately 6,000 doses of medication abortion into anti-abortion states every month, according to founder Rebecca Gomperts.Many abortion rights advocates say they will continue to send abortion pills through the mail no matter how the Supreme Court rules.
55% : Many anti-abortion advocates have instead pinned their hopes on changing the culture around abortion pills -- hoping to make women skeptical of obtaining the pills through the mail without an ultrasound or a doctor's visit, even though studies show it is overwhelmingly safe to do so.
55% : A Supreme Court ruling that compels the FDA to reinstate old restrictions would be an important step toward changing how the pills are perceived, anti-abortion advocates said.
48% : "Many women ... are taking these drugs in unsafe ways because they're hearing from the FDA that they're safe to take in this way," said Christina Francis, chief executive of the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
37% : Conservative policy groups such as the Heritage Foundation have also said that Trump should use executive authority to crack down on the drug if he is elected again.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.