Mashable Article Rating- Bias Rating
-50% Medium Liberal
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
30% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
| "If/When/How, an advocacy organization working to ensure all people have the power to determine if, when, and how to define, create, and sustain families with dignity, according to its website, is deeply aware of the coection between privacy and the right to abortion." | Positive | 10% Conservative |
| "If this reasoning were adopted, it would not only reverse a half century of abortion rights, but it would undermine the Constitution's long-recognized right to privacy, which has played a role in protecting everything from the right to contraceptives to the right to same-sex marriage, he explained over email." | Negative | -6% Liberal |
| "That's because the right to abortion, according to the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling, stems from the right to privacy guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause." | Negative | -8% Liberal |
| "Contraception, consensual same-sex conduct, interracial marriage, and same-sex marriage are all within the sweep of what the Supreme Court is calling into question.While it's unclear what, exactly, comes next -- Chief Justice John Roberts insisted that the authentic leaked draft document is not final -- privacy and legal experts see a dangerous and regressive path ahead." | Negative | -14% Liberal |
| "Notably, the many experts we spoke with agreed that the threat to Americans' privacy-derived rights is not limited solely to the right to abortion." | Negative | -18% Liberal |
| "And while the public's immediate reaction to the news understandably focused on what such a reversal would mean for the right to abortion, experts warn that the Court's looming decision presages yet another attack on a sacrosanct American right: the right to privacy." | Negative | -24% Liberal |
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
55% : If/When/How, an advocacy organization working to ensure "all people have the power to determine if, when, and how to define, create, and sustain families with dignity," according to its website, is deeply aware of the connection between privacy and the right to abortion.47% : "If this reasoning were adopted, it would not only reverse a half century of abortion rights, but it would undermine the Constitution's long-recognized right to privacy, which has played a role in protecting everything from the right to contraceptives to the right to same-sex marriage," he explained over email.
46% : That's because the right to abortion, according to the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling, stems from the right to privacy guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause.
43% : "Contraception, consensual same-sex conduct, interracial marriage, and same-sex marriage are all within the sweep of what the Supreme Court is calling into question."While it's unclear what, exactly, comes next -- Chief Justice John Roberts insisted that the authentic leaked draft document is not final -- privacy and legal experts see a dangerous and regressive path ahead.
41% : Notably, the many experts we spoke with agreed that the threat to Americans' privacy-derived rights is not limited solely to the right to abortion.
38% : And while the public's immediate reaction to the news understandably focused on what such a reversal would mean for the right to abortion, experts warn that the Court's looming decision presages yet another attack on a sacrosanct American right: the right to privacy.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.