Frank Luntz Needs to Retire
View Original Article-10% Center
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
-10% Center
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
N/A
N/A
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Reliability Score Analysis
The Reliability Score of the article is determined on a percentage score basis from 0 to 100%.
- Opposite Sources as Excellent for a very high number of sources with different viewpoints.
- Unique Sources as Excellent for a very high number of different sources.
- Multiple Sources as Excellent for a very high number of total sources.
- Multiple Quotes as Excellent for a very high number of quotes used in the article.
- Quote Length as Poor for the lower number of words used in each quote.
Opposite Sources: 100% Excellent (Grade A) Unique Sources: 100% Excellent (Grade A) Multiple Sources: 100% Excellent (Grade A) Multiple Quotes: 100% Excellent (Grade A) Quote Length: 25% Poor (Grade E)
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Politician Portrayal Analysis:
This article includes the following Politician Portrayal sentiments, providing an average sentiment of 0% Neutral and bias score of -10% Liberal:
10 negative sentiments and 6 positive sentiments for Donald Trump
1 negative sentiment for Liz Cheney
2 negative sentiments and 1 positive sentiment for Joe Biden
1 negative sentiment for Adam Schiff
1 negative sentiment for Mitt Romney
"It was Democrat liars such as Adam Schiff who blamed Hillary's election loss on Russian bots."
This is a negative sentiment.
"It was Democrat liars such as Adam Schiff who blamed Hillary's election loss on Russian bots."
This is a negative sentiment.
"It was RINO liars such as Mitt Romney who inexplicably blamed Joe Biden's Ukraine bribery scandals on President Trump."
This is a negative sentiment.
"It was RINO liars such as Mitt Romney who inexplicably blamed Joe Biden's Ukraine bribery scandals on President Trump."
This is a negative sentiment.
"It was RINO liars such as Mitt Romney who inexplicably blamed Joe Biden's Ukraine bribery scandals on President Trump."
This is a negative sentiment.
"It was the politicized American intelligence agencies and their press corps marionettes that covered up Biden family corruption."
This is a negative sentiment.
"In this case, it appears that Sloppy Frank has been sent out to sound the alarm that Trump's threat to the swamp is real and will require even more aggressive countermeasures than the banana republic indictments that the Department of (in)Justice has already deployed."
This is a negative sentiment.
"Why a supposedly Republican-leaning pollster would have found enjoyment sitting through a Hillary Clinton coronation reveling in Republican grief is beyond me -- unless these Republican-ishy squishes are perhaps Uniparty agents and conservative in name only!"
This is a negative sentiment.
"It is Merrick Garland's DOJ faction that has hunted down and imprisoned Trump-supporters."
This is a negative sentiment.
"It was congressional Robespierres such as Liz Cheney who called for patriotic J6 election protesters to be treated as "insurrectionists" and "terrorists.""
This is a negative sentiment.
"If Luntz were honest, he would admit that it is not Trump who poses a threat to America's system of government, but rather all the Deep State saboteurs, foreign interlopers, and Antifa domestic terrorists who refuse to let ordinary Americans have their say."
This is a negative sentiment.
"So when the guy who resembles a street vendor selling Chicago Red Hots tells the world that Donald Trump can win again, we're less interested in his "expert" opinion than the reason he has been paid to announce his opinion."
This is a negative sentiment.
"It is always bewildering to watch Luntz and his ilk claim that any Trump election victory will mean the end of "democracy.""
This is a negative sentiment.
"As The Sydney Morning Herald warns apocalyptically, "Leading US pollster Frank Luntz says Donald Trump can re-win the presidency and that if that happens, US democracy could collapse."nnTo make sure that the globe's u00fcber-elite take action before the 2024 presidential election becomes a 2016 sequel, Less-than-Frank went into screechy-sweaty-panic-mode during the Margaret Thatcher conference at the Center for Policy Studies in London."
This is a negative sentiment.
"Overrated political pollster Frank Luntz admitted last week that he was wrong to prematurely dismiss a Trump comeback."
This is a negative sentiment.
"And there sat ol' Frank, still shaking his head and predicting Clinton victory."
This is a positive sentiment.
"Anyway, President Trump was wiing one battleground state after the next (this was before full-on mail-in-ballot election-rigging), Colbert's pluck had turned to tears, and the polling man from the van down by the river was still insisting that Hillary Clinton was certain to win."
This is a positive sentiment.
"Anyway, President Trump was wiing one battleground state after the next (this was before full-on mail-in-ballot election-rigging), Colbert's pluck had turned to tears, and the polling man from the van down by the river was still insisting that Hillary Clinton was certain to win."
This is a positive sentiment.
"I still remember watching Luntz sitting in the front row of Stephen Colbert's 2016 Election Night show solemnly insisting through most of the evening that Donald Trump had no chance of winning."
This is a negative sentiment.
"The whole spectacle was intended to be a celebratory yuk-fest for leftists to pat themselves on the backs for being so righteous and brilliant while sticking it to Trump voters and laughing at their misery."
This is a negative sentiment.
"It was the Intelligence Community and (in)Justice Department, after all, that conspired with Hillary Clinton's campaign to polarize an already divided nation with fraudulent claims that Donald Trump was neck-deep in international espionage as a Russian spy."
This is a positive sentiment.
"It was the Intelligence Community and (in)Justice Department, after all, that conspired with Hillary Clinton's campaign to polarize an already divided nation with fraudulent claims that Donald Trump was neck-deep in international espionage as a Russian spy."
This is a positive sentiment.
""Not only can Donald Trump win the GOP primary again, but he can also win the presidency again," Luntz tweeted."
This is a positive sentiment.
"For the global "elites," taking down Trump is even more vital than saving Ukraine."
This is a positive sentiment.
"Needless to say, Luntz's 180 degree flip-flop from his own "expert" opinion of just last year, when he confidently predicted that Trump is toast, came off more like a barely-disguised call to arms begging for more foreign election interference, left-wing shock troop mobilization, and World Economic Forum funding."
This is a positive sentiment.
"It is the Biden junta that now seeks to lock up President Trump for life."
This is a positive sentiment.
"It is the Biden junta that now seeks to lock up President Trump for life."
This is a positive sentiment.
Policies:
ICEPoliticians:
Hillary ClintonDonald Trump
Liz Cheney
Joe Biden
Adam Schiff
Mitt Romney
Sentiments
0% For the global "elites," taking down Trump is even more vital than saving Ukraine."
0% Needless to say, Luntz's 180 degree flip-flop from his own "expert" opinion of just last year, when he confidently predicted that Trump is toast, ..."
0% "Not only can Donald Trump win the GOP primary again, but he can also win the presidency again," Luntz tweeted."
-6% I still remember watching Luntz sitting in the front row of Stephen Colbert's 2016 Election Night show solemnly insisting through most of the evening ..."
-6% The whole spectacle was intended to be a celebratory yuk-fest for leftists to pat themselves on the backs for being so righteous and brilliant ..."
-12% "It's just a little bit of ice, Luntz kept insisting.""
-12% Overrated political pollster Frank Luntz admitted last week that he was wrong to prematurely dismiss a Trump comeback."
-12% As The Sydney Morning Herald warns apocalyptically, "Leading US pollster Frank Luntz says Donald Trump can re-win the presidency and that if that happens, ..."
-14% It is always bewildering to watch Luntz and his ilk claim that any Trump election victory will mean the end of "democracy.""
We have listed the top 10 sentiments. More sentiments do exist. Please review the full article for more information.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
44% : It's just a little bit of ice, Luntz kept insisting.*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.