Yellowhammer News Article RatingU.S. Appeals Court overturns key enforcement mechanism of Voting Rights Act - Yellowhammer News
- Bias Rating
-2% Center
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
-10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
40% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
| "But assuming their existence, and even discussing them, is different from actually deciding that a private right of action exists, Judge David Stras wrote for the majority." | Positive | 8% Conservative |
| "Rudofsky's ruling threw out a lawsuit brought by the Arkansas Public Policy Panel and the Arkansas NAACP.RELATED: Federal judges issue final map to AlabamaThe 8 Circuit, in a 2 to 1 decision, ruled that the text of the Voting Rights Act does not explicitly call for a private right of action, and that it remains unclear if Section 2 of the act creates an individual right to bring forth such legal challenges." | Negative | -10% Liberal |
| "Civil rights groups and individual citizens do not have standing under the law to bring those cases." | Negative | -20% Liberal |
Upgrade your account to obtain complete site access and more analytics below. | ||
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
54% : "But assuming their existence, and even discussing them, is different from actually deciding that a private right of action exists," Judge David Stras wrote for the majority.45% : Rudofsky's ruling threw out a lawsuit brought by the Arkansas Public Policy Panel and the Arkansas NAACP.RELATED: Federal judges issue final map to AlabamaThe 8 Circuit, in a 2 to 1 decision, ruled that the text of the Voting Rights Act does not explicitly call for a "private right of action," and that it remains unclear if Section 2 of the act creates an individual right to bring forth such legal challenges.
40% : Civil rights groups and individual citizens do not have standing under the law to bring those cases.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.